cleIMC home

Cleveland Indy Media Center

cleveland indymedia
About Us Contact Us Subscribe Calendar Radio Show Publish
white themeblack themered themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themeblack themetheme help

Sep 20 Real Time Presentation Service from Money Maker Ma

Sep 25 Columbus Socialism Forum -- Why You Should Vote So

Add an Event

printable version - email this article

A brief account of the meeting to discuss the future of Valley View estates
by kris harsh Wednesday January 07, 2004 at 06:20 PM

Approximately 50 people met Tuesday January 6th to discuss and the learn about the plans for renovating (that is, destroying) the puplic housing at Valley View in Cleveland's Tremont neighborhood.

The meeting started with George Phillips the acting director of CMHA (Cleveland Metropolitan Housing Authority) giving a background on the situation. He explained that HUD had approved demolition of the apartments the day before, on Jan.5th2004, and that a January 20th deadline had been set for the application for the HOPEVI federal funding. He also broke the news that residents will be re-located starting later this month.

Local Councilman Joe Cimperman followed (after circling the room to shake hands with all in attendance) by extolling the virtues of the plan calling it "important to the range of income values" in Tremont, whatever that means. He thanked Tremont Near West Development Corporation, CMHA and some local residents (who won't be local for long). He asked those from Valley View who had been helping in the plan to raise their hands, four went up. He left shortly thereafter, before the questions began.

Up next was Michael Bowen the CMHA HopeVI Coordinater who explained in more detail the process that has been going on for the past four years. He stated that in June of 2003 CMHA approved the plans for Valley View and in October Hud approved of the HopeVI application (which is still pending approval). CMHA will request between 14 and 16 million dollars with the application but the demolition will occur weather it is approved or not. CMHA will fund the program on it's own to the tune of 15 million or so. If the HopeVI funding is approved the project will run around 30 to 35 million overall.

Following Mr. Bowen was Barbara Freeland, project manager for the development company McCormack Baron and Salazar of St. Louis Missouri. She explained the plans for renovation and answered many of the questions along with Mr. Bowen.

After the question and answer session (described elsewhere) Esther Shin and Sandra Moore (vice-president and president, respectively) of Urban Strategies addresed the community services that would be provided in the new development.

The meeting lasted about and hour and a half. Although there were some residents of Valley View in attendence, a great portion of those present were from Tremont West Development Corporation and various others with financial stakes in the plans.

add your comments

Listed below are the 10 latest comments of 3 posted about this article.
These comments are anonymously submitted by the website visitors.
good for who? kris Sunday January 11, 2004 at 12:19 PM
Average Joe Valley View Estates Saturday January 10, 2004 at 11:30 AM
correction kris Saturday January 10, 2004 at 01:28 AM
IMC Network: Projects print radio satellite tv video Africa ambazonia canarias estrecho / madiaq nigeria south africa Canada hamilton maritimes montreal ontario ottawa quebec thunder bay vancouver victoria windsor winnipeg East Asia burma jakarta japan manila qc Europe alacant andorra antwerpen armenia athens austria barcelona belarus belgium belgrade bristol bulgaria croatia cyprus estrecho / madiaq euskal herria galiza germany grenoble hungary ireland istanbul italy la plana liege lille madrid malta marseille nantes netherlands nice norway oost-vlaanderen paris/île-de-france poland portugal romania russia scotland sverige switzerland thessaloniki toulouse ukraine united kingdom valencia west vlaanderen Latin America argentina bolivia brasil chiapas chile chile sur colombia ecuador mexico peru puerto rico qollasuyu rosario santiago tijuana uruguay valparaiso Oceania adelaide aotearoa brisbane burma darwin jakarta manila melbourne oceania perth qc sydney South Asia india mumbai United States arizona arkansas atlanta austin baltimore big muddy binghamton boston buffalo charlottesville chicago cleveland colorado danbury, ct dc hawaii houston hudson mohawk idaho ithaca kansas city la madison maine miami michigan milwaukee minneapolis/st. paul new hampshire new jersey new mexico new orleans north carolina north texas nyc oklahoma omaha philadelphia pittsburgh portland richmond rochester rogue valley saint louis san diego san francisco san francisco bay area santa barbara santa cruz, ca seattle tallahassee-red hills tampa bay tennessee united states urbana-champaign utah vermont virginia beach western mass worcester West Asia armenia beirut israel palestine ukraine Topics biotech Process discussion fbi/legal updates indymedia faq mailing lists process & imc docs tech volunteer

© 2000-2006 Cleveland Indy Media Center. Unless otherwise stated by the author, all content is free for non-commercial reuse, reprint, and rebroadcast, on the net and elsewhere. Opinions are those of the contributors and are not necessarily endorsed by the Cleveland Indy Media Center. Running sf-active v0.9.4 Disclaimer | Privacy